Which term should be avoided in MRI safety policy language?

The term that should be avoided in MRI safety policy language is "must." This is because "must" implies an absolute requirement or an obligation that leaves no room for interpretation. In the context of safety policies, it is essential to communicate guidelines and recommendations that allow for flexibility while still emphasizing the necessity of adherence to safety protocols.

On the other hand, terms like "should" and "could" provide a level of guidance that acknowledges best practices while still allowing for professional judgment based on specific circumstances. "Can" suggests a possibility, but it does not carry the same weight of obligation as "must."

Using "must" can lead to confusion or rigidity in policy implementation, where operators or staff might feel compelled to follow the rules without considering the context, potentially leading to unsafe practices. By utilizing softer, more nuanced terms, the policy can promote a culture of safety that encourages thoughtful decision-making and risk assessment.